Pagina 1 di 1
ORS n°2750629
Inviato: sab apr 05, 2014 7:43 pm
da filo
Ho di recente preso questa RS, MMD T6 V5.3 (1945-1946).
Fino a qui niente di strano, ma in questa variante si riscontra spesso una piccola differenza, se volete dilettarvi nello scoprirlo, vi rimando a questo mio vecchio topic.
I recently took this RS, MMD T6 V5.3 (1945-1946).
Until there is nothing strange, but in this variant there is often a small difference, if you want to have fun in discovering it, I refer you to my old topic.
http://www.rkka.it/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=26809
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: sab apr 05, 2014 9:35 pm
da Nota_Bene
I am not good at riddles, but looks like this piece has been heated. Is the enamel original?
Alexei
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: sab apr 05, 2014 9:43 pm
da filo
Nota_Bene ha scritto:I am not good at riddles, but looks like this piece has been heated. Is the enamel original?
Alexei
The enamel is original, the peculiarity is in the medallion.
a (2).jpg
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: sab apr 05, 2014 9:48 pm
da Nota_Bene
If memory doesn't fail ... again this is common in this range. Of course I have never studied those variations in detail.
Still, it looks like it was heated. If the enamel is original, then there might have been a repair done to the screwpost or the medallion. This could also be all in my head.
Alexei
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: sab apr 05, 2014 9:56 pm
da filo
Nota_Bene ha scritto:If memory doesn't fail ... again this is common in this range. Of course I have never studied those variations in detail.
Still, it looks like it was heated. If the enamel is original, then there might have been a repair done to the screwpost or the medallion. This could also be all in my head.
Alexei
Honestly, and in this case, I am not able to understand if the enamel has been entirely replaced, and if you say so, it is probably true, tomorrow I can only take a picture with a good light.
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: sab apr 05, 2014 10:34 pm
da Nota_Bene
Not necessarily, I could be totally wrong about that. You can never be totally sure when dealing with a photo.
Alexei
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: dom apr 06, 2014 1:23 am
da filo
Da queste foto con il flash, si vedono molte gocce di saldatura, e lo smalto sembra anche opaco, penso proprio che tu abbia ragione.
From these photos with the flash, you can see many drops of solder, and the enamel seems too opaque, I think you're right.
I thought that I had only this star with the enamel completely restored.
Io credevo di aver solo questa stella con lo smalto completamente restaurato
http://www.rkka.it/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=27182
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: dom apr 06, 2014 2:36 am
da Nota_Bene
It's hard to tell for sure from pictures, but the enamels look completely original to me. It is possible that it had the screwpost repaired.
Alexei
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: dom apr 06, 2014 1:06 pm
da Auke
I don't think the enamel has been replaced.
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: dom apr 06, 2014 1:59 pm
da ruiz
Auke ha scritto:I don't think the enamel has been replaced.
I think the same.
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: dom apr 06, 2014 7:11 pm
da rocketscientist
I think that the dullness of the enamels is a photographic effect. In the first pictures, which I like most, it was dark but definitely bright. I could not notice anything off-nominal in the enamel.
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: lun apr 07, 2014 5:43 pm
da filo
Grazie a tutti per l'aiuto.
Alexei,
you're right about overheating, it seems that the threaded screw has been repaired.
Alexei, hai visto giusto sul surriscaldamento, sembrerebbe che la vite filettata sia stata riparata.
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: mar apr 08, 2014 4:24 am
da Nota_Bene
Possibly, or just a sloppy production job in the first place. In any case it does not dimish it's historical value in any way.
Alexei
Re: ORS n°2750629
Inviato: mar apr 08, 2014 10:31 am
da filo
Nota_Bene ha scritto:Possibly, or just a sloppy production job in the first place. In any case it does not dimish it's historical value in any way.
Alexei
