Rkka.it Forum

Hi,

what do you think about this specimen?

best regards
Andreas

Nice order Andreas. One of the lowest serial that i ever seen.

Very nice...low number. it is a jewel

Hi Andreas,

I like it, it seems to be the real thing. Wait for Alexei's confirmation.

Marc

Thanks for your oppinions.

I didn´t bought this one.

I have a bad feeling with this one. But just a feeling.

Avers:
1) The letter ж is disturbed.
2) the surface of the hands is a little rough (or just patina??)

Reverse:
1) the letters look a littler bit strange in my oppinion

thanks to all
Andreas

It looks good to me. Looks of course being the key word here

Alexei

Here's a bad picture of 394 for comparison.

Alexei

Personally, I like it. The issue on the "ж" might be a defect of manufacturing that went covered with white enamel. The porosity on the crown of shaking hands is odd, actually, but it looks the same on the surface of the reverse, could be an effect (temperature?) of the surface treatment. Finally, I do not see any inconsistency in the monetni dvor letters, what exactly bothers you, Andreas?

Thanks for your oppinions.

Looks like I saw ghosts.

best
Andreas

Alfred ha scritto: Looks like I saw ghosts.

Knowing you, Andreas, I would't never dare to say so. I am just trying keep up the discussion and to learn from you more insight about your observations. Maybe I am just too innocent when trying to justify all the strange features of this specimen but, actually, I am not convinced it is a fake. Also the calligraphy of the serial number looks very similar to the close neighbour shown by Alexei.

I think that the order is a jewel. In my opinion it's original.
On the letter ж in the second image, it's possible to see a "darker white" zone, I'm sure that's the proof of originality.